You won't believe what's in this paper! Clickbait, relevance and the curiosity gap

نویسندگان

چکیده

Drawing on a corpus of clickbait headlines (Chakraborty et al., 2016) and using ideas from the relevance-theoretic pragmatic framework (Sperber Wilson, 1986/95), this paper examines some ways in which writers arouse curiosity their readers by creating an “information gap” (Loewenstein, 1994). Comparative analysis is combined with close illustrative examples to explore contribution that particular parts-of-speech make creation successful clickbait. I focus two main categories are overrepresented statistically significant degree: (i) definite referring expressions (ii) superlatives intensifiers. The results reveal these contribute information gap encouraging construct new conceptual files based terms used headline, while providing little or no content for those files. This then drives reader click associated link expectation article will contain relevant he can enhance his files, this, turn, reward him cognitive effects.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Detecting Clickbait in Online Social Media: You Won't Believe How We Did It

In this paper, we propose an approach for the detection of clickbait posts in online social media (OSM). Clickbait posts are short catchy phrases that attract a user’s attention to click to an article. The approach is based on a machine learning (ML) classifier capable of distinguishing between clickbait and legitimate posts published in OSM. The suggested classifier is based on a variety of fe...

متن کامل

Should you believe that this coin is fair?

Faced with a sequence of N binary events, such as coin flips (or Ising spins), it is natural to ask whether these events reflect some underlying dynamic signals or are just random. Plausible models for the dynamics of hidden biases lead to surprisingly high probabilities of misidentifying random sequences as biased. In particular, this probability decays as N −1/4 , so that no reasonable amount...

متن کامل

Do You Believe in Presentiment?

with, the supernatural, which would seem to relegate it to the domain of the theologian or the preacher ? To which of these it more properly belongs, need not be determined at present, but I may be permitted to add that I think it may be accounted for on either hypothesis, without any serious offence to, or violent disruption of, existing beliefs, and 1 heartily agree with Copland* when he says...

متن کامل

You gotta believe

I argue that proper assertion requires belief. Jennifer Lackey has recently argued otherwise. Here I respond to Lackey’s argument and provide positive evidence that permissible assertion does require belief. The positive evidence takes the form of an explanatory argument from linguistic patterns surrounding the give and take of assertion. Looming large in the background of the discussion is whe...

متن کامل

Can you believe what you read in the papers?

The number of reports of clinical trials grows by hundreds every week. However, this does not mean that people making decisions about healthcare are finding it easier to obtain reliable knowledge for these decisions. Some of the information is unreliable. Systematic reviews are helping to resolve this by bringing together the research on a topic, appraising and summarising it. But the quality o...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Pragmatics

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0378-2166', '1879-1387']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.023